Navigating Global Environmental Crises in The Classroom: Student Perspectives on Developing Future-Ready Skills Through Project-Based Inquiries

Nasirudin Nasirudin; Rokimin Rokimin

doi:10.71039/istifham.v4i2.152

Authors

Nasirudin Nasirudin Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia
Rokimin Rokimin Universitas Darunnajah, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v4i2.152

Keywords:

environmental crises, future-ready skills, project-based inquiry, student perspectives, Sustainability Education

Abstract

The escalation of global environmental crises, including climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion, demands that education systems cultivate future-ready skills in the younger generation. This study aims to explore students' perspectives on developing future-ready skills (critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and ecological literacy) through project-based inquiries focused on global environmental crises. The research employed a qualitative case study approach involving 36 senior high school students in Indonesia who participated in an eight-week project-based learning program on the environment. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, reflective journals, and student project artifacts, then analyzed using Miles and Huberman's interactive thematic analysis. The findings reveal four key themes: (1) enhanced awareness of environmental interdependence, (2) strengthened collaborative problem-solving competencies, (3) development of transdisciplinary critical and creative thinking, and (4) emergence of agentic ecological citizenship. Students reported increased confidence in addressing complex real-world issues and articulated a stronger sense of responsibility toward sustainability. The study concludes that project-based inquiries into environmental crises effectively bridge classroom learning and 21st-century competencies, while recommending the curricular integration of global issues as authentic contexts for developing future-ready learners in Indonesian secondary education.

References

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school’s students scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5493

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project- Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning: Are They Effective to Improve Student’s Thinking Skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V6I2.11100

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2018.11.001

Creswell, J. W. ., & Poth, C. N. . (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Fadel, Charles., Bialik, Maya., & Trilling, Bernie. (2015). Four-dimensional education : the competencies learners need to succeed. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Grossman, P. L. ., Herrmann, Zachary., Kavanagh, S. Schneider., & Dean, C. G. Pupik. (2021). Core practices for project-based learning : a guide for teachers and leaders. Harvard Education Press.

Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V. T. (2020). Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 1947, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12051947

Hussein, B. (2021). Addressing Collaboration Challenges in Project-Based Learning: The Student’s Perspective. Education Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, Page 434, 11(8), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11080434

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage, 1985. Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842

OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skill 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030.

Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017). Empowering students’ chemistry learning: The integration of ethnochemistry in culturally responsive teaching. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 813–830.

Reimers, F. M. (2021). Education and Climate Change (F. M. Reimers, Ed.). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57927-2

Ristek, K. (2021). Panduan Pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila.

Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). A systematic review of climate change education: giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children’s Geographies, 18(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532

Trott, C. D. (2020). Children’s constructive climate change engagement: Empowering awareness, agency, and action. Environmental Education Research, 26(4), 532–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1675594

Wals, A. E. J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenges? The role of education and lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/EJED.12250