The Role of Tadwīn Hadith in the Development of Islamic Historiography

Authors

  • Tri Nurcahyani Sari Tanjung UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Zulfi Fadhlurrahman Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v3i3.123

Keywords:

Islamic Historiography, Criticism of Hadith, Tadwin Hadith Methodology, Tadwin Hadis

Abstract

This study discusses the contribution of the method of codification (tadwīn) of hadith to the development of early Islamic historiography. The relationship between the tradition of hadith and history is often viewed in a dichotomous manner; hadith is considered a strictly theological-juridical domain, while history (tārikh) is considered a loose narrative. This research aims to deconstruct this view by analyzing the crucial role of hadith codification (tadwīn) in shaping Islamic historiographic methodology. Using qualitative research methods with a descriptive-analytical approach, this study traces the epistemological transition from oral to written traditions in the early centuries of the Hijri. This study outlines four main contributions, namely: (1) hadith as a source of historical information, (2) hadith collection methods that influence historical data tracking techniques, (3) sanad and matan criticism methods that introduce the principle of validation in historical writing, and (4) methods of compiling hadith books that form the structure of historiographic writing, such as the use of tabaqāt approaches and biographies of figures. This paper shows that the methods in the study of hadith have provided a strong epistemological foundation for the Islamic historiographic tradition, especially in the aspects of source accuracy and systematics in the preparation of historical narratives.

References

Abdul Haris. (2024). Usul Al-Hadis: Teori Dasar studi Hadis Nabi Muhammad SAW. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Afrinaldi, R., & Hakim, L. (2024). Historiografi Islam Di Indonesia. Tarikhuna, 6(1).

Asep Herdi. (2014). Memahami Ilmu Hadis. Tafakur.

Benny Afwadzi. (2017). Kritik Hadis dalam Perspektif Sejarawan. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis, 7(1), 50–75.

Bin Abdullah, Y. (2020). Metode Penulisan Kitab Gharib Al-Hadith Serta Pengaruhnya pada Perkembangan Ilmu Hadis. Tadabbur: Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 2(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v2i1.83

Chase Robinson. (2003). Islamic Historiography. Cambridge University Press.

Dzikri Nirwana. (2015). Tradisi Rihlah' Ilmiyyah di Kalangan Ulama Hadis. Jurnal Studia Insania, 3(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v3i2.1119

Fadhlurrahman, M., Romlah Abubakar Askar, & Munzir Suparta. (2025). Kritik Matan Serta Contoh-contoh Haditsnya. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.5281/Zenodo.15872141

Faizal Luqman, Euis Indah Kesuma Ningsih, & Sonya Liani Nasution. (2023). Sejarah Penulisan dan Pembukuan Hadis. Pappasang, 5(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.46870/jiat.v5i1.446

Firmanto, A. (2015). Historiografi Islam Cirebon (Kajian Manuskrip Sejarah Islam Cirebon). Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 13(1), 31–58.

Franz Rosenthal. (1968). A History of Muslim Historiography. E. I. BRILL.

Idri. (2010). Studi Hadis. Kencana.

Jamaluddin. (2013). Tinjauan Konseptual terhadap Kompilasi dan Kodifikasi (Tadwin) Hadis. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 24(1), 15–33.

Jumal Ahmad. (2024). Pionor Historiografi Islam. PT. Pustaka Dzerwa Indonesia.

Kamaluddin, A. (2023). Naqd As-Sanad: Metodologi Validasi Hadits Shahih. Mushaf Journal: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Hadis, 3(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.54443/mushaf.v3i2.136

Kurniasih, A., & Alif, M. (2018). Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis (Kajian terhadap Kitab Al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah Baina Ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Hadīs karya Muhammad al-Gazāliy. Jurnal Holistic al-Hadis, 4(2), 42–66.

Manna' Al-Qatthan Terj. Mifdhol Abdurrahman. (2005). Pengantar Studi Ilmu Hadis (1 ed.). Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Moh Isbat Afan Ghoffari. (2024). Kritik terhadap Ilmu Hadis: Dirayah dan Riwayah. Dalam Islam di Era Modernisasi: Tantangan dan Solusi (1 ed.). Penerbit Digdaya Book.

Mohammad Mustafa Azami. (1978). Studies Early Hadīth Literature (2 ed.). American Trust Publications.

Muhammad Ali Ngampo. (2021). Shahifah: Embrio Pembukuan Hadis. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 23(1).

Muhammad Hanafi Burhanuddin. (2022). Dimensi Sosial Hadis Perspektif Ibnu Khaldun dan Implementasi Kajian Hadis di Era Kontemporer. UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Muhammad, & Najiyah, N. L. N. N. (2025). Tradisi Penulisan Hadis Syiah dan Sunni: Telaah Perspektif Rasul Ja'fariyan dalam Tadwin al-Hadits. Journal of Hadith Studies, 8(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.32506/johs.v8i1-03

Munandar. (2018). Kritik Pandangan Mahmud Abu Rayyah terhadap Tadwin Hadis. Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam, 1(2).

Muzhiat, A. (2019). Historiografi Arab Pra Islam. Tsaqofah, 17(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.32678/tsaqofah.v17i2.3189

Nafisah, L., & Muhtador, M. (2018). Wacana Keadilan Shahabat Dalam Pandangan Ulama Klasik Dan Kontemporer. Al Quds : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 2(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i2.429

Ngayu Soraya, Maryamah, & Maryam. (2021). Historiografi Islam dan Perkembangannya. Desanta Muliavisitama.

Nizar, M. (2019). Tadwin Al-Hadith (Kontribusinya sebagai Penyempurna Hukum Islam Ke dua). Jurnal al-Tsiqoh (Dakwah dan Ekonomi), 4(1), 18–31.

Primawan, D. P., & Mawardi, K. (2023). Historiografi Islam. Transformasi Manageria: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 4(1), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.47467/manageria.v4i1.4126

Rosahib Mualana. (2023). Historiografi Kodifikasi Hadis. Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 6(1).

Rosyidah, A., Kholis, N., & Husna, J. (2021). Periodisasi Hadis dari Masa ke Masa (Analisis Peran Sahabat dalam Transmisi Hadis Nabi Saw). Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 22(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v22i2.9506

Saifuddin. (2013). Tadwin hadis dan Kontribusinya dalam Perkembangan Historiografi Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 12(1), 33–58.

Saifudin. (2011). Arus Tradisi Tadwin Hadis dan Historiografi Islam. Pustaka Belajar.

Salim, M. F. N. (t.t.). Keadilan Dan Kedhabithan Periwayat Hadits.

Siti Badi'ah. (2015). Kritik Hadits di Kalangan Ilmuwan Hadits Era Klasik dan Ilmuwan Hadits Era Modern. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Al-Hadits, 9(1), 57–80.

Soleh, K., & Iskandar, A. (2020). Metodologi Kritik Dan Pendekatan Dalam Memahami Hadis. Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, 2(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v2i2.7651

Sulțān Sanad Al-’Akayilah. (2001). Naqd al-Hadīs bi al-’Ardhi “Ala al-Waqāi” wa al-Ma’lūmat al-Tārikhiyyah (1 ed.). Dār al-Fath Li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī’.

Syakir Jamaluddin. (2004). Tadwin al-Hadis: Kontroversi Sekitar Autentisitas Hadis Larangan Penulisan Hadis. Jurnal Tarjih, 7.

Tilawati, A. (2022). Kajian Kitab At-Thabaqat Al-Kubra Karya Ibnu Sa'ad. SINDA: Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Social Studies, 2(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.28926/sinda.v2i2.508

Wahyudi, A. (2013). Mengurai Peta Kitab-Kitab Hadits (Kajian Referensi atas Kitab-Kitab Hadits). al-Ihkam, 8(1), 1–20.

Wahyudin Darmalaksana. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati.

Wazna, R. (2018). Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentisitas Hadis ( Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki ). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin, 17(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiu.v17i2.2243

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tanjung, T. N. S., & Fadhlurrahman, Z. (2025). The Role of Tadwīn Hadith in the Development of Islamic Historiography. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies, 3(3), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v3i3.123

Similar Articles

21-30 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.